Maybe Arizona is the only state in the Union where voter fraud has sporadically occurred, someone find that evidence for me.
But I just read the Supreme Court's opinion and it basically says to me:
"We'll allow the state to put up roadblocks to voting and see what the fallout is."
Let's just see how much disenfranchise occurs.
Okay, so when some older folks are lining up to ask why they couldn't submit a normal vote (does the phrase, "Provisional Ballot," ring a bell folks?) will the Supreme Court pay attention then?
Did the Supreme Court make sure that Floridians weren't disenfranchised in 2000? No.
Did the Supreme Court make sure that Ohioans and Floridians weren't disenfranchised in 2004? No.
Arizona Voter ID Supreme Court Opinon "Given the importance of the constitutional issues, the Court wisely takes action that will enhance the likelihood that they will be resolved correctly on the basis of historical facts rather than speculation."
When does historical fact begin to count, Justice Stephens?????????????? Wise? Blind and deaf.
Are even the court's "moderates" so isolated in their ivory tower that they do not see what direction fraud is actually coming from, our government officials???
Supreme Court Opinion
Which state will be added to the list in 2008? Will Virginia and Missouri elections be fraudulent this year?
Diebold strongholds
1 comment:
I have to say, this post makes me REALLY sad about this country.
Post a Comment